Showing posts with label Site Specific. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Site Specific. Show all posts

Monday, February 25, 2013

MOAH: Museum of Art & History, Lancaster, CA

 Over the weekend I went to MOAH for the first time for an artist talk and had the pleasure of encountering work by several artists whom I adore. Below is an installation by Megan Geckler, whose site-specific installations are created with materials not intended for art making. I was thrilled to finally see a work in person. The layout of the museum allowed for viewers to see the piece from the ground floor and from the second floor of the atrium. Rewritten by Machine on New Technology  is on view from January 26th, 2013- March 10, 2013.

Megan Geckler. Rewritten by Machine on New Technology, 2013.


 Also on view were some colorful PODS by Gisela Colon, a fantastic interactive installation Nervous Structure by Cuppetelli/Mendoza and a fiber installation by Nike Schroder, 34˚N 118˚W which was especially wonderful but very difficult to photograph due to its size and position in the entry Atrium.



 
 Cuppetelli/Mendoza, Nervous Structure
Cuppetelli/Mendoza, Nervous Structure





 Overall, I was incredibly impressed with the space and the selection of contemporary works on view and despite the lengthy drive from Los Angeles, I will definitely return.


Saturday, July 14, 2012

Berlinische Galerie in Berlin

I highly recommend visiting the Berlinische Galerie the next time you are in Berlin. There is an excellent collection of art there which was made in Berlin as well as many great contemporary artists on view. The museum had many artists working in site specific installation which is one of my personal favorites. We are so accustomed to entering an art institution and walking past rows upon rows of two-dimensional artworks that we often forget about the space which exists beyond the flat surface of the gallery walls. It is a wonderful decision when a curator chooses to engage viewers with the actual space of the gallery or museum,  so that people can walk around, through or on top of artworks. This method of display helps to break us out of the redundant viewing experience one can have when wandering through room upon room of images hung on the walls. For some reason, installation engages me in a way that gives my viewing experience a little pep, and I have found that my energy level increases, making the rest of my trip through the museum a little less tiring. 
Berlinische Galerie, Berlin
On view was the exhibition "Art in Berlin 1880-1980", in which all of the artworks are part of the permanent collection of the Berlinische Galerie. The show was arranged chronologically and included artworks from multiple movements which I find fascinating in the history of art. They included, but were not limited to: Secessionists, Avant-Garde, November Group, Dada, New Objectivity, Postwar Surrealism, Abstraction, Postwar Architecture, and New Figuration. 

Hannah Höch & Dadaist Propaganda
George Grosz / John Heartfield "The Conformist Turned Wild", Electro-mechanical Tatlin Sculpture, 1920
John Heartfield and Rudolf Schlichter, "Prussian Archangel", 1920


I was surprised to see the installation of this piece, which I believe is a re-construction of the original, to be very close to its initial means of display at the First International Dada Fair in 1920. 


The rest of the exhibition was lengthy, and I spent an hour and a half navigating the multiple rooms. 


The lower level of the museum contained works by contemporary artists, some of which I found quite stimulating. In the first room you enter after showing your ticket to the guard, there were five trees hanging from rotating axles which were suspended between the gallery walls. It is by far, one of my all time favorite installations by Michael Sailstorfer, the recipient of the  Vattenfall Contemporary 2012 entitled Forst. 

   

Watching Forst in motion, was akin to watching the waves hit the beach, or leaves caught in the wind because each time the trees rotated on their axis, the level of movement and sound was different. Below each tree, bits of branches and leaves formed concentric circles, and spirals as the trees deteriorated within the gallery walls. The effect was sensational and romantic within the confines of the white cube, and I derived as much pleasure from the installation as from watching other viewers interact with the work and observe it. I had a child-like grin plastered on my cheeks when I noticed the museum guard staring at one of the trees as if he was in a trance. I am so pleased with an installation when an artist shows us there is more to artwork and our experience outside of a gallery than flat two dimensional paintings or photographs. Works like Sailstorfer's Forst, help us to re-imagine what we  believe should or should not be displayed in a museum. Is it art in the traditional sense-no, but did it put a smile on my face and inspire me? Yes, and because of that, I feel that something qualifies as art when it has an effect on my state of being; when an artwork sparks my interest or challenges my belief system I am suddenly engaged and I leave the gallery fulfilled.


Wednesday, March 14, 2012

New York City Art Fairs: Armory Week 2012



I just remembered I never posted about my week-long trip to New York for a pan-continential art excursion. I was searching for inspiration and I feel it is necessary to see all the new artists being included in the fairs these days. There was no lack of options to fulfill the needs of either I or my mother, who joined me on my quest.

Our first stop was Pier 92, part of the Armory Show that focused on Modern Art. There was no shortage of abstract expressionism and representational paintings, paintings, paintings. Of course, the Modern period, would not be complete without several fantastic Louise Nevelsons to adore. How I cherish her! I was also fortunate enough to see one of her miniature works in the home of a friend. He had casually placed it on top of his stereo receiver. I will have to remember to take a photo of it next time I visit.
Louise Nevelson
After Pier 92, we headed for Pier 94. The contemporary section of fairs are usually my forte and please me the most. Sadly, I was dissapointed. It may have been because we were there for the VIP opening day- It was remarkably crowded. I was also let down by the Nordic section of the fair. I felt I was stepping over piles of posters, books and navigating my way through hanging fabrics and lightbulbs. Was it just me or did it seem that all of the galleries had brought work that had been curated by the same person? My mother did manage to leave with a roll of toilet paper printed with the word ANGST in red lettering. And I escaped with a pen that says something about "pay attention to poetry".. Who really knows at this point. My suitcase is still packed with tear sheets and flyers indicating dates for upcoming shows, and artist resumes.

My favorite fair was the Independent located in a quaint building in Chelsea. The building was at least three stories tall and viewers were required to climb a very steep and narrow stairway if they were not patient enough to wait for the elevator which was the side of a small public restroom stall. The layout of the Independent was a nice change to the grid pattern booths of temporary walls we so commonly see at massive art fairs. Instead, each gallery was allocated an area or corner on each level. This method of display allowed viewers to meander through and around artworks and between booths without feeling like they have to greet everyone who is patiently waiting for a sale.

For me, the gems of the fair were a series of small white on white paintings by Sam Windett which I absolutely adored but were already sold!!!

I really enjoyed Scope, it was a manageable size and had many artists that were playing with

Under The Sun (white on white), 2012Oil on canvas, 62x43cm


I really enjoyed Scope, it was a manageable size and had many artists that were playing with installation and and a variety of media as opposed to strictly painting. There were however, some galleries and "wanna-be galleries" I felt lowered the quality of the the fair as a whole.

By chance, as I was attempting to navigate my way out of Scope, I got trapped in a corridor of mirrors and a young woman made eye-contact with me and herded me towards a door in what appeared to be a wall. She asked me "Do you want to go in?" I agreed, as I have learned to do when attending art events, although I had no idea what I was agreeing to. Sometimes, it is not something I would like to see or in the worse case scenario it can be a performance piece I would not like to participate in (yes, this has happened on one or two occasions). I walked in to find a mirrored room, full of trophies. I must say I am a big enthusiast for site specific installation. This one was by Kenton Parker. You can read about the piece by clicking the hyperlink below.  Interesting effect, and yes, it has been done before in way more interesting ways, but it did make for a good instagram photo. 


Infinity Trophy Room | A installation from Kenton Parker on view at the entry to Scope New York | March 7 – 11, 2012